Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 11/8/1937

Groman v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 302 U.S. 82
  • 58 S. Ct. 108
  • 82 L. Ed. 63
  • 1937 U.S. LEXIS 534
  • 2 C.B. 286
  • 19 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]hen an exclusive definition is intended the word ‘means’ is employed, * * * whereas here the word used is ‘includes.’”
  • “when an exclusive definition is intended the word ‘means’ is employed, . . . whereas here the word used is ‘includes’ ”
  • “[W]hen an exclusive definition is intended the word ‘means’ is employed, * * * whereas here the word used is ‘includes.’ ”
  • “[W]hen an exclusive definition is intended the word ‘means’ is employed .... ”
  • “When an exclusive definition is intended the words ‘means’ is employed.”
  • “When an exclusive definition is intended the words ‘means’ is employed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Groman v. Commissioner

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.