Arnold Winters v. Charles Miller, Superintendent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that state court’s erroneous application of Fretwell did not require reversal of conviction because de novo review under Strickland standard rendered the same result
• concluding that the state court’s erroneous application of Fretwell did not require reversal of conviction because de novo review under the Strickland standard rendered the same result
• \Appellate counsel's performance is deficient if counsel fails to appeal an issue that is both obvious and clearly stronger than one that was raised.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).