Skip to main content
· 11/3/2005

Gravens v. State

Citations

  • 836 N.E.2d 490
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2038
  • 2005 WL 2877895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the preferred practiced is to use pattern jury instructions because they have apparent approval of our supreme court
  • finding sufficient evidence to disprove abandonment defense because defendant became flustered and left the bank after the bank teller loudly questioned him about his demand note
  • \abandonment is not voluntary if it is the result of unanticipated difficulties in carrying out the criminal plan.\
  • sufficient evidence to disprove abandonment defense where the evidence indicated that defendant abandoned his planned bank robbery only after teller questioned him about contents of note demanding money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Sullivan, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.