Antonio L. Vaughn v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that videos of drug transactions merely showed the conduct of the CI and defendant and that a detective’s testimony regarding the videos was not hearsay because it was based on the detective’s personal observation and did not relay an out-of-court statement
• a pat-down search of the CI or buyer is sufficient, and a strip search or complete cavity search is not necessary
• sufficient evidence supported conviction for maintaining a common nuisance where defendant delivered cocaine to confidential informant from his apartment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).