Skip to main content
· 8/20/2009

Dear v. Shinseki

Citations

  • 578 F.3d 605
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18712
  • 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,650
  • 106 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1802
  • 2009 WL 2535740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • summary judgment appropriate when best evidence is plaintiffs allegations that her problems within the department derived from white staff members and supervisors
  • “This court considers a theory raised in court to fall within the scope of an administrative complaint if it is reasonably related to the charges actually set forth in the administrative filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.