Caroline M. Sitar v. Indiana Department of Transportation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in Title VII context, the plaintiff had not engaged in protected activity because she “complained only that she felt picked on, not that she was discriminated against ‘because of’ sex or gender, which is what Title VII requires”
• explaining that whether transfer is adverse action depends on how disad- vantageous the change is
• noting that the court may need to examine events over a longer period of time
• explaining that whether transfer is adverse action depends on how disadvantageous the change is
• finding that the same employee’s termination was retaliatory when, after the transfer, employee filed charges specifically alleging sex discrimination and hostile work environment with employer’s affirmative action office
• explaining that whether transfer is adverse action depends on how disadvantageous the change is

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).