Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/17/1992
Dean v. State
Citations
- 600 A.2d 409
- 325 Md. 230
- 1992 Md. LEXIS 11
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that courts “are not required to give requested instructions if the matter is fairly covered by the instructions actually given”
- stating that courts \are not required to give requested instructions if the matter is fairly covered by the instructions actually given\
- noting that a “nolle prosequi is simply the prosecution’s abandonment of a charging document count or part of a count” and that it “need not be couched in any particular language or take any specific form’
- a nolle prosequi “ ‘need not be couched in any particular language or take any specific form; it is the substance of the prosecution’s action which controls’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Chasanow, Karwacki, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-10· cited 121×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-17· cited 60×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-21· cited 41×
- General v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-14· cited 36×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 12×
- Higginbotham v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-29· cited 12×
- Henry v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-02-04· cited 11×
- Dishman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-12-01· cited 5×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 4×
- State v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-05-27· cited 4×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-06· cited 3×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1942-02-02· cited 1,400×
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 1,061×
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 1,048×
- Hopper v. EvansSupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 715×
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-28· cited 176×
- MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-23· cited 168×
- Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-13· cited 124×
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-10-07· cited 101×
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-04-07· cited 93×
- Binnie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-10· cited 77×
- State v. EarpCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-10· cited 74×
- Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-30· cited 71×
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-07-19· cited 54×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-10· cited 50×
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-03-24· cited 29×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-02-25· cited 24×
- Fairbanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-06· cited 21×
- Krauss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-04-01· cited 18×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-01-09· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.