Krauss v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant's statements on the record constituted a waiver and obviated the need for the State to offer proof of his prior convictions
• stipulations voluntarily and knowingly entered into during criminal proceedings will be enforced
• “Generally, a defendant is entitled to enter into agreements that waive or 26 o vt .h e Lr ew wi is se , a 5f 9f e Nc et v .h i 2s 6 2o ,r h 2e 7r 7 ,f u 9n 1d a Pm .e 2n dt a 8l 2 0r ,i g 8h 2t 5s -. 2” 6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).