Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/24/1982
Hooper v. State
Citations
- 443 A.2d 86
- 293 Md. 162
- 1982 Md. LEXIS 236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]f jeopardy had attached at the trial, the nol pros on appeal will ordinarily operate as an acquittal of the underlying charges because of double jeopardy principles.”
- when a case is pending in the appellate courts, “the Attorney General, rather than the State’s Attorney, ordinarily has the authority and responsibility to represent the State.”
- nol pros entered during appeal from dismissed indictments because State was proceeding to trial on new information alleging the same crimes
- “To permit the State to withdraw a nolle prosequi, or have a nol prossed indictment reinstated, would be flatly inconsistent with the nature of a nolle prosequi under Maryland law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-13· cited 124×
- Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-03-06· cited 62×
- Curley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-03· cited 53×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-10-07· cited 43×
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-23· cited 41×
- Gilmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-07· cited 34×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-02-25· cited 24×
- State v. MeadeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-09-01· cited 21×
- Mora v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-25· cited 19×
- Dean v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-17· cited 16×
- McNeil v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-03· cited 15×
- In Re Darren M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-15· cited 13×
- Babbitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-08-04· cited 13×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 12×
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-12-18· cited 12×
- Syed v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2024-08-30· cited 5×
- Simms v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-03· cited 4×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-06· cited 3×
- Blackston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-05· cited 2×
- In re Don Mc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-06· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1967-03-13· cited 1,817×
- Dealy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1894-04-02· cited 181×
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-04-07· cited 93×
- State v. MouldenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-02-24· cited 47×
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-05-21· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1889-03-01· cited 44×
- State v. JonesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-06-01· cited 28×
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1870-06-28· cited 23×
- Knotts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-04· cited 22×
- Brady v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-06-07· cited 14×
- Holtz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-06-01· cited 11×
- Kistler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1878-11-15· cited 11×
- Stocker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-06-04· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.