Marcus v. AT & T CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that filed tariff doctrine bars any remedy that requires a refund of a portion of the filed rate
• dismissing customers’ claim that carrier fraudulently concealed practice of rounding up charges to next full minute; customers who paid filed rate had no legally cognizable claim for damages or fraud
• “Any remedy that' requires a refund of a portion of the filed rate ... is barred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).