Consumer Advocates v. Echostar Satellite Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that UCL claims were subject to the reasonable consumer test where the predicate violations were of the FAL and CLRA, both of which require meeting the reasonable consumer test
• a satellite broadcaster’s assertion that it provided “crystal clear digital” video quality was puffery and not actionable as a warranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).