Skip to main content

State v. Barrett

Citations

  • 299 S.C. 485
  • 386 S.E.2d 242
  • 1989 S.C. LEXIS 196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “when a witness has not been impeached, evidence of prior consistent statements is inadmissible” and calling the violation of this principle “improper bolstering”
  • finding the admission of improper bolstering testimony mandated reversal because \the State relied solely upon [the] [v]ictim's testimony to establish the details of the crime and the identity of the perpetrator\
  • social worker’s testimony as to details of sexual abuse reported by victim constituted impermissible bolstering of victim's testimony because the testimony was not limited to the time and place of assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Finney, Gregory, Harwell, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.