Skip to main content

Matthews v. State

Citations

  • 565 S.E.2d 766
  • 350 S.C. 272
  • 2002 S.C. LEXIS 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that \[C]ounsel cannot assert trial strategy as a defense for failure to object to comments which constitute an error of law and are inherently prejudicial\
  • concluding that \[C]ounsel cannot assert trial strategy as a defense for failure to object to comments which constitute an error of law and are inherently prejudicial\
  • “Vouching for a witness based on outside material conveys the impression to the jury that the solicitor has evidence not presented to the jury but known by the prosecution which supports conviction.”
  • \A solicitor may not vouch for the credibility of a State's witness based on personal knowledge or other information outside the record.\
  • where counsel articulates a valid reason for employing certain strategy, the conduct will not be deemed ineffective assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Pleicones, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.