Indiana Court of Appeals· 1/28/2005
Goldsberry v. State
Citations
- 821 N.E.2d 447
- 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 118
- 2005 WL 183152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing intent and mistake with respect to motive and prior relationships between defendant and victim
- prior evidence of misconduct admissible where defendant raised self-defense claim in opening argument
- no double jeopardy when separate evidence presented to support elements of each crime
- evidence of hostile relationship admissible to rebut claim of self-defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.