Skip to main content

Goldsberry v. State

Citations

  • 821 N.E.2d 447
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 118
  • 2005 WL 183152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing intent and mistake with respect to motive and prior relationships between defendant and victim
  • prior evidence of misconduct admissible where defendant raised self-defense claim in opening argument
  • no double jeopardy when separate evidence presented to support elements of each crime
  • evidence of hostile relationship admissible to rebut claim of self-defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.