Skip to main content

Kendall v. State

Citations

  • 790 N.E.2d 122
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 1051
  • 2003 WL 21399862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a witness’s prior statement to police identifying the defendant as the driver of the car used in the crime was admissible as substantive evidence under Evidence Rule 801(d)(1)(C
  • affirming admission of out-of-court statement of identification made one month after witness perceived event
  • witness’s prior statement to police identifying defendant as driver of car used in crime was admissible as substantive evidence under Evidence Rule 801(d)(1)(C) where witness recanted her prior identification statement at trial identifying defendant
  • witness’s prior statement to police identifying defendant as driver of car used in crime was admissible as substantive evidence under Evidence Rule 801(d)(1)(C) where witness recanted her prior identification statement at trial identifying defendant
  • witness’s prior statement to police identifying defendant as driver of car used in crime was admissible as substantive evidence under Evidence Rule 801(d)(1)(C) where witness recanted her prior identification statement at trial identifying defendant
  • impeached witness saw shooting that gave rise to trial for attempted murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Sullivan, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.