Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 121 So. 3d 462
  • 2013 WL 3334954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the error in Davis harmless based on curative instructions and the replaying of the tape
  • discussing cases in which police officers fostered an expectation of privacy in conversations that took place in police interrogation rooms, where individuals usually would have no expectation of privacy
  • discussing cases in which police officers fostered an expectation of privacy in conversations that took place in police interrogation rooms, where individuals usually would have no expectation of privacy
  • “This Court has emphasized that in order to qualify as HAC, ‘the crime must be both conscienceless or pitiless and unnecessarily torturous to the victim.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.