Supreme Court of Florida· 7/8/2013
Davis v. State
Citations
- 121 So. 3d 462
- 2013 WL 3334954
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the error in Davis harmless based on curative instructions and the replaying of the tape
- discussing cases in which police officers fostered an expectation of privacy in conversations that took place in police interrogation rooms, where individuals usually would have no expectation of privacy
- discussing cases in which police officers fostered an expectation of privacy in conversations that took place in police interrogation rooms, where individuals usually would have no expectation of privacy
- “This Court has emphasized that in order to qualify as HAC, ‘the crime must be both conscienceless or pitiless and unnecessarily torturous to the victim.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-10-14· cited 545×
- Wilcox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-05-08· cited 32×
- Rafael Andres v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2018-09-20· cited 19×
- Thomas Rigterink v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-04-21· cited 15×
- & SC13-1787 Steven Douglas Hayward v. State of Florida and Steven Douglas Hayward v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2015-06-25· cited 13×
- Khalid Ali Pasha v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-05-11· cited 13×
- Donald Otis Williams v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-01-19· cited 10×
- Bruce Bernard Strachan v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-06-29· cited 4×
- Roop v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-04· cited 4×
- ROBERT NEWBY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-29· cited 3×
- Mullins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-23· cited 2×
- State v. CampbellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-21· cited 1×
- Darious Wilcox v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-07-10
- Lavonte Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-08
- Granville Ritchie v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2022-06-09
- Michael Marotta v. State Of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-07-31
- 110OAG40Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2025-07-22
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG40Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2025-07-18
Cites
93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 969×
- Wainwright v. GreenfieldSupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 752×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-26· cited 745×
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-18· cited 539×
- Urbin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-05-07· cited 249×
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-06-14· cited 188×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-13· cited 175×
- Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-01-18· cited 153×
- Holton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-15· cited 149×
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-03-01· cited 143×
- Swafford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-29· cited 134×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.