Skip to main content

Roop v. State

Citations

  • 228 So. 3d 633
  • 2017 WL 4393245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that whether a witness's actions before calling 911 indicated reflective thought so as to negate a hearsay exception was not an issue raised by the appellant
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the excited utterance hearsay exception applied where the victim stated to a 911 operator that someone threw a metal pipe at his car and where there was no time to contrive or mispresent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salario, Wallace, Rothstein-Youakim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.