Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 299 Ga. 424
  • 788 S.E.2d 433
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any error in admitting evidence which appeared to have aided the defense was harmless
  • holding that State’s line of questioning regarding why and where defendant got his tattoos during cross-examination of defendant was not relevant to determine identity or any other purpose
  • explaining that OCGA § 24-1-103 (a) of the new Evidence Code continues the preexisting harmless error doctrine in Georgia
  • explaining that OCGA § 24-1-103 (a) of the new Evidence Code continues the preexisting harmless error doctrine in Georgia
  • explaining that OCGA § 24-1-103 (a) of the new Evidence Code continues the preexisting harmless error doctrine in Georgia
  • explaining that \[t]he new Evidence Code continues Georgia's existing harmless error doctrine for erroneous evidentiary rulings\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.