Skip to main content

Comeaux, Farrain Joseph

Citations

  • 445 S.W.3d 745
  • 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1558
  • 2014 WL 5247960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that á defendant who chooses to employ peremptory strikes outside of the strike zone may not then complain about harm concerning a juror within the strike zone who could have been removed instead
  • holding that a defendant who chooses to employ peremptory strikes outside of the strike zone may not then complain about harm concerning a juror within the strike zone who could have been removed instead
  • requiring that defendant demonstrate same five steps to establish harm from erroneous denial of challenge for cause
  • providing that appellant must have “used a peremptory challenge on the complained-of venire member”
  • stating that to SOLIS — 34 establish harm regarding the denial of a causal challenge, the appellant must show, among other things, that he exhausted his peremptory challenges, and the trial court denied his request for additional strikes
  • taking counsel’s unchallenged representations on the record as established fact for purposes other than evidentiary sufficiency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Johnson, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Comeaux, Farrain Joseph

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.