Skip to main content

Hernandez v. State

Citations

  • 390 S.W.3d 310
  • 2012 WL 5869393
  • 2012 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that juries should hot consider evidence that depends on mere sympathy or emotional response in' de•termining a defendant's death worthiness
  • stating that a trial court abuses its discretion when its decision falls outside the zone of reasonable disagreement
  • stating that “it is only when there is a clear disparity between the degree of prejudice of the offered evidence and its probative value that Rule 403 is applicable”
  • noting that restricting potentially confusing or misleading questions is within trial court’s discretion
  • holding question was improper commitment question because it sought a “yes” or “no” answer and committed the prospective juror to a determination of whether a particular circumstance, being abused as a child, was mitigating
  • “Whether a juror considers a particular type of evidence to be mitigating is not a proper area of inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Price, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Alcala, Keller, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

176 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.