Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 761 So. 2d 1154
  • 2000 WL 627659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s proximity to drugs discovered in public alley was insufficient, without more, to prove his constructive possession of drugs
  • holding that evidence of only proximity to the drugs in a public area was insufficient to convict under a constructive possession theory
  • holding that evidence of only proximity to the drugs in a public area was insufficient to convict under a constructive possession theory
  • finding the State failed to prove concealment where a firearm may have been in ordinary sight but was not visible to officers in darkness
  • reversing conviction for carrying concealed firearm where state failed to prove concealment because black firearm might have been in plain view but not visible to officers in darkness
  • proof of mere proximity of the defendant to the drugs is insufficient to sustain a conviction for constructive possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casanueva

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.