Edmond v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was insufficient evidence to prove the defendant had knowledge of or dominion and control over illicit drugs that were hidden in a wall less than an arm's length from where police found the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Duncan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-02· cited 26×
• Santiago v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-08· cited 11×
• State v. Holland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-05· cited 8×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-12· cited 7×
• State v. Gutierrez & Perez-Lazaro
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-01-28· cited 6×
• DONTE AHMAD MCCRAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-05· cited 3×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-12· cited 2×
• Whiting v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-10· cited 1×
• Ylomon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-16

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-03-03· cited 180×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17· cited 30×
• Agee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-04-06· cited 29×
• Wagner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-09· cited 26×
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-26· cited 22×
• Mitchell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-30· cited 16×
• J.S.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-08· cited 15×
• Person v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-21· cited 7×
• Gibson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-06· cited 5×