Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 581 So. 2d 887
  • 1991 WL 88735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the circumstantial evidence “must be of a conclusive nature and tendency, leading on the whole to a reasonable and moral certainty that the accused and no one else committed the offense charged” (quoting Hall v. State, 107 So. 246, 247 (Fla. 1925))
  • finding Scott was \no longer able to corroborate his alibi that initially was checked out by\ police
  • “it is important to recognize that hair comparisons do not constitute a basis for positive personal identification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.