Skip to main content

Rocker v. State

Citations

  • 122 So. 3d 898
  • 2013 WL 4610003
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to reach the conclusion that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction as a principal, the jury would have to impermissibly stack inferences
  • concluding that Rocker’s actions on the night of the murder were “just as consistent with the theory that he was participating in a drug transaction as [they were] with the theory that he was participating in a robbery”
  • the defendant’s mere presence at the scene, knowledge of the offense, and flight from the scene were insufficient to support his conviction as a principal for another person’s conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northcutt, Villanti, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.