Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 882 S.E.2d 210
  • 315 Ga. 252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that it was not an abuse of discretion to conclude that the defendant’s failure to file a timely statutory speedy trial motion and the “29- month delay in asserting his constitutional speedy-trial right[] weighed heavily against him”
  • identifying no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s conclusion that a 30-month delay weighed “lightly” against the State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.