Skip to main content

Sullivan v. State

Citations

  • 301 Ga. 37
  • 799 S.E.2d 163
  • 2017 WL 1374762
  • 2017 Ga. LEXIS 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that trial counsel was not deficient for failing to object to alleged “testimonial hearsay in violation of [appellant’s] Sixth Amendment right to confrontation” because it was a strategic decision
  • “[W]e evaluate only the effects of matters determined to be error, not the cumulative effect of non-errors.”
  • “[A] matter such as the cross-examination of a witness is most often grounded in matters of trial tactics and strategy and, in those instances, provides no basis for finding counsel’s performance deficient.”
  • “a matter such as the cross-examination of a witness is most often grounded in matters of trial tactics and strategy and, in those instances, provides no basis for finding counsel’s performance deficient”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.