Skip to main content

Matthews v. State

Citations

  • 301 Ga. 286
  • 800 S.E.2d 533
  • 2017 WL 2332645
  • 2017 Ga. LEXIS 433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding reasonable professional conduct where counsel consulted with a supervisor, decided not to hire an expert, and instead used cross- examination and closing argument to advance the defense theory
  • counsel reasonably determined not to call expert witness and focused on cross- examination and argument to advance defense theory
  • no deficient performance where counsel elected to use cross-examination and argument to advance defense theory rather than calling defense expert
  • no deficiency where defense counsel elected not to call expert witness and instead decided to use cross-examination and argument to advance defense theory
  • trial counsel was not deficient for failing to retain an expert and instead choosing to “use cross-examination and argument to advance a defense theory”
  • no deficiency where defense counsel elected not to call expert witness and instead decided to use cross-examination and argument to advance defense theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.