Supreme Court of Georgia· 11/21/2016
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 300 Ga. 252
- 794 S.E.2d 60
- 2016 Ga. LEXIS 765
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that order denying a motion for acquittal on statutory speedy trial grounds is directly appealable
- explaining that findings of fact required on a defendant’s claim of the denial of his constitutional right to a speedy trial should be consistent with the framework of such a claim and sufficient to provide a basis for appellate review of the issue
- affirming the denial of the defendant’s statutory demand for a speedy trial as untimely but remanding for the trial court to enter an order with findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the defendant’s demand for a speedy trial under the federal Constitution
- “Appellant was represented by counsel when he filed that [speedy trial] demand, so it was invalid.” (emphasis added)
- the denial of a speedy trial motion based on statutory grounds is immediately appealable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nahmias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-03-15· cited 45×
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-10-19· cited 27×
- Schumacher v. City of RoswellSupreme Court of Georgia· 2017-06-30· cited 22×
- Gonzales v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2023-02-21· cited 20×
- Goins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-03· cited 16×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2022-12-20· cited 13×
- Redding v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2020-06-16· cited 9×
- McCullum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2024-03-05· cited 7×
- Terrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-04· cited 6×
- ELLIS v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-10-26· cited 5×
- VANTAGE CANCER CENTERS OF GEORGIA, LLC v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH (Three Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia· 2024-02-20· cited 3×
- Roy Boone Bright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-04-20
- Gary Diggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-02-11
- The State v. Lewis.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-06-17
- John Peter Kishel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-09-18
- Xavier Demones Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-10-13
- Rajan Ronnell Childs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-10-11
- Stefon Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-12-30
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2024-08-13
- Calvin Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-09-14
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- Tolbert v. TooleSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-11-17· cited 171×
- Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2008-06-30· cited 168×
- Sosniak v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-19· cited 77×
- State v. BucknerSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-02-04· cited 57×
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-10-15· cited 52×
- Higgenbottom v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-01-10· cited 45×
- Bloomfield v. BloomfieldSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-06-04· cited 36×
- Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-27· cited 32×
- Sweatman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-10-04· cited 27×
- Ealy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-09-08· cited 18×
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-04-18· cited 13×
- Hagan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2014-03-03· cited 10×
- Ware v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1997-02-17· cited 7×
- Abiff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1990-10-03· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.