Skip to main content

Davis v. Microsoft Corp.

Citations

  • 149 Wash. 2d 521
  • 14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing a decision to deny a CR 50(a) motion despite the lack of renewal by CR 50(b) motion
  • requiring remand where defendant proposed `a special verdict form that would have eliminated the uncertainty'
  • requiring remand where defendant proposed ‘a special verdict form that would have eliminated the uncertainty’
  • reviewing a decision to deny a CR 50(a) motion despite the lack of renewal by CR 50(b) motion
  • turning to reassignment only after other accommodations were ineffective because Davis could not perform the essential functions of his current job under any circumstances
  • employer is not required by WLAD to provide a reduced work schedule as an accommodation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chambers, Madsen, Owens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.