Dan J. Jovanovic v. In-Sink-Erator Division of Emerson Electric Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “regular and timely attendance is an essential function of the tool and die maker position”
• holding that plaintiffs 24 absences in 12 months disqualified him as a “qualified individual” under the ADA
• holding that twenty-four absences in twelve months made it impossible for plaintiff to perform the essential functions of his job, thereby disqualifying him from the right to a reasonable accommodation under the ADA
• affirming district court’s finding that plaintiff was not a qualified individual based in part on his twenty-four absences in twelve months
• rejecting as unreasonable an accommodation that would have permitted the plaintiff \to come and go as he pleased\
• “[O]ur review of the entire record in this case supports the district court’s finding that regular attendance is an essential function of the tool and die maker position . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).