State Ex Rel. Markley v. Baldwin
Citations
- 112 U.S. 490
- 5 S. Ct. 278
- 28 L. Ed. 822
- 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1901
Syllabus
<p>A suit on an administrator’s bond, taken in the name of a State for the benefit of parties interested, is, for the purposes of-jurisdiction, to bo regarded as a suit in the name of the party for whose benefit it is brought.</p> <p>Testimony as to admissions and conduct of a deceased person cannot be impeached by proof of that person’s statement concerning the character of the witness testifying to them.</p> <p>If one of the issues at a trial bo whether parties cohabiting together in a State in which marriage is a civil contract, to which no attending ceremonies are necessary, were man an'd wife, it is the duty of the court to direct the jury, in the absence of statutory regulations on the subject, to the necessity of proof of some public recognition of the marriage, by which it can beknown, or reputation of the relation may obtain.</p> <p>A general verdict upon distinct issues raised by several pleas cannot be sustained if there was error as to the admission of evidence, or in the charge of the court, as to any one of the issues.</p>
Judges: Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harris County v. SmithTexas Supreme Court· 2002-12-19· cited 286×
- Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentThird Circuit· 1999-05-11· cited 276×
- Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.Supreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 230×
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court· 1931-11-23· cited 229×
- Tire Engineering & Distribution, LLC v. Shandong Linglong Rubber Co.Fourth Circuit· 2012-06-06· cited 227×
- United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1886-04-26· cited 211×
- Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1897-12-06· cited 201×
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 166×
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1980-03-17· cited 150×
- Barbara Asbill v. Housing Authority of the Choctaw Nation of OklahomaTenth Circuit· 1984-02-02· cited 150×
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-01-31· cited 149×
- Davis v. RennieFirst Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 125×
- Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2003-06-05· cited 120×
- Wilmington Star Mining Co. v. FultonSupreme Court· 1907-03-04· cited 118×
- Colonial Stores, Inc. v. ScarbroughSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-02-27· cited 109×
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-07-30· cited 101×
- Travers v. ReinhardtSupreme Court· 1907-04-15· cited 92×
- McCaig Ex Rel. Estate of McCaig v. Wells Fargo Bank (Texas), N.A.Fifth Circuit· 2015-06-10· cited 86×
- Dakota Industries, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ever Best Ltd. Dakota Blue Corp. Carl Eckhaus Sam Ko Kenneth Kwok, Appellees/cross-AppellantsEighth Circuit· 1994-07-08· cited 78×
- Ada S. Kern v. Levolor Lorentzen, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1990-03-09· cited 70×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.