Pasha Hunt-Golliday v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, despite the fact that plaintiff was suspended the day after announcing her pregnancy, plaintiff had failed to show any connection between her announcement and the suspension
• holding that to survive a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff need only allege that “the protected activity and the adverse action were not wholly unrelated”
• noting that “suspicious timing does constitute circumstantial ... evidence to support a claim of discrimination”
• requiring that a plaintiff making a claim of discrimination \establish ’that the protected activity and the adverse action were not wholly unrelated.’\
• noting that a “pattern of criticism and animosity” by plaintiff's supervisors that began almost immediately after her protected activity could serve as evidence of animus in the interim
• determining what specific actions should be taken by an employer requires an interactive process involving participation by both sides

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).