Lorraine Beck v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Chancellor John Schroeder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employer sufficiently participated in the interactive process in part because the employee “offer[ed] no evidence that” the alternative accommodation proposed by her employer “was an unreasonable accommodation”
• concluding that the plaintiff had not made reasonable efforts to help the employer determine what accommodations were necessary where she made only a “tentative request” and did not “press the issue”
• stating that \failure to provide the information may be the cause of the breakdown and the party withholding the information may be found to have obstructed the process\
• observing that a court’s “flexibility” includes the option to “remand on an open record for further proceedings” (citing Garrison, 759 F.3d at 1021)
• stating that “failure to provide the information may be the cause of the breakdown and the party withholding the information may be found to have obstructed the process”
• stating that there is no liability under the ADA when an employer makes reasonable efforts to both communicate with the employee and provide accommodations based on the information it possesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).