Boyd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that jury could find that a two week suspension, 16 written reprimand, removal from employment responsibilities, and reports to DOH and 17 the police, taken together, constituted adverse employment action
• the action must be “materially adverse” and involve “more than an inconvenience” or alteration of job duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cornwell v. Microsoft Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 64×
• Boyd v. Department of Social & Health Services
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-03· cited 1×
• Hbh Sah And Trey Hamrick v. State Of Washington
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-12-13
• Jin Zhu v. N. Cent. Educ. Serv. District
  Washington Supreme Court· 2017-11-09
• Bryan Worland, V. Kitsap County
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-04-16
• Thomas E. Bittner, V. Symetra Life Insurance Company
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-10-28
• Verduzco v. King County
  Washington Supreme Court· 2026-06-11

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 7,269×
• State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1971-03-25· cited 1,211×
• Staub v. Proctor Hospital
  Supreme Court· 2011-03-01· cited 1,083×
• State v. Camarillo
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-07-26· cited 730×
• Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, Alberto
  D.C. Circuit· 2006-02-28· cited 611×
• Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-04-14· cited 319×
• State v. Berlin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-11-20· cited 252×
• Robel v. Roundup Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 230×
• Scrivener v. Clark College
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-09-18· cited 204×
• Chrissie Washington v. Illinois Department of Revenue
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-08-22· cited 179×
• Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-I
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-05-17· cited 176×
• Allison v. Housing Authority of City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 162×
• Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 161×
• Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-06-21· cited 159×
• Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-05-22· cited 138×
• Davis v. Microsoft Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-06-05· cited 120×
• Martini v. Boeing Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-02-11· cited 87×
• Kirby v. City of Tacoma
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-10-05· cited 86×
• Kirby v. City of Tacoma
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-09-14· cited 84×
• Blaney v. International Ass'n of MacHinists
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-04-01· cited 77×