Utah Supreme Court· 1/21/1988
Davis v. Davis
Citations
- 749 P.2d 647
- 74 Utah Adv. Rep. 9
- 1988 Utah LEXIS 12
- 1988 WL 3758
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- giving \considerable weight\ to the fact that one parent had been the child's \pri mary caregiver\ during the four years that divorce and custody proceedings were ongoing
- explaining that “the ultimate test of the propriety of an alimony award is whether, given all of these factors, the party receiving alimony will be able to support him- or herself as nearly as possible at the standard of living ... enjoyed during marriage” (omission in original
- \[Clonsiderable weight should be given to which parent has been the child's primary caregiver.\ (citing Pusey v. Pusey, 728 P.2d 117, 120 (Utah 1986))
- “considerable weight should be given to which parent has been the child’s primary caregiver”
- “In considering competing claims to custody between fit parents under the ‘best interests of the child’ standard, considerable weight should be given to which parent has been the child’s primary caregiver.”
- \So long as [the court's] discretion is exercised within the confines of the legal standards we have set ... we will not disturb the resulting {custody} award.\ (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zimmerman, Hall, Stewart, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Maughan v. MaughanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-02-22· cited 60×
- Noble v. NobleUtah Supreme Court· 1988-08-15· cited 58×
- Nickerson v. NickersonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-02-07· cited 57×
- Custody of KaliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-08-01· cited 49×
- Bell v. BellCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-04-23· cited 47×
- Howell v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-02-28· cited 42×
- Rasband v. RasbandCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-04-18· cited 39×
- Naranjo v. NaranjoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-03-22· cited 35×
- Bakanowski v. BakanowskiCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-10-23· cited 34×
- Childs v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-10-01· cited 30×
- Hudema v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-10-15· cited 30×
- Stevens v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-04-28· cited 28×
- Tucker v. TuckerUtah Supreme Court· 1996-01-17· cited 27×
- Schindler v. SchindlerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-06-06· cited 23×
- Paryzek v. ParyzekCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-06-06· cited 21×
- Thronson v. ThronsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-03-25· cited 19×
- Rule v. RuleCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2017-08-03· cited 19×
- Myers v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-02-02· cited 16×
- Peterson v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-10-15· cited 16×
- Moon v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-03-19· cited 16×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jones v. JonesUtah Supreme Court· 1985-04-17· cited 118×
- Matter of Adoption of HallowayUtah Supreme Court· 1986-12-05· cited 114×
- Ashton v. AshtonUtah Supreme Court· 1987-02-04· cited 76×
- English v. EnglishUtah Supreme Court· 1977-06-02· cited 73×
- Gardner v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court· 1988-01-04· cited 70×
- Smith v. SmithUtah Supreme Court· 1986-09-30· cited 56×
- Jorgensen v. JorgensenUtah Supreme Court· 1979-08-20· cited 52×
- Becker v. BeckerUtah Supreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 51×
- Pusey v. PuseyUtah Supreme Court· 1986-08-18· cited 49×
- Moody v. MoodyUtah Supreme Court· 1985-12-06· cited 25×
- Sanderson v. TryonUtah Supreme Court· 1987-06-16· cited 24×
- Hyde v. HydeUtah Supreme Court· 1969-05-21· cited 16×
- Fontenot v. FontenotUtah Supreme Court· 1986-01-17· cited 15×
- Mitchell v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court· 1983-07-20· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.