Utah Supreme Court· 12/10/1984
Becker v. Becker
Citations
- 694 P.2d 608
- 1984 Utah LEXIS 973
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the rationale behind the change-in-circumstances requirement “is that custody placements, once made, should be as stable as possible unless the factual basis for them has completely changed”
- applying Hogge and emphasizing that changes must be material, ie., \the kind of cireumstances on which an earlier custody decision was based\
- discerning no abuse of discretion in altering \visitation arrangements\ even though there was \no substantial change in civeumstances material to the modification of custody\
- on modification hearing, it was noted that trial court considered joint custody but did not order it in initial decree
- modification of visitation rights requires a procedure similar to that required for modification of custody
- “[C]ustody placements, once made, should be as stable as possible unless the factual basis for them has completely changed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Maughan v. MaughanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-02-22· cited 60×
- Davis v. DavisUtah Supreme Court· 1988-01-21· cited 49×
- Jeffrey R. Arnott v. Paula a/k/a Polly A. ArnottWyoming Supreme Court· 2012-12-28· cited 48×
- Elmer v. ElmerUtah Supreme Court· 1989-05-03· cited 45×
- Watt v. WattWyoming Supreme Court· 1999-01-19· cited 39×
- Fullmer v. FullmerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-09-16· cited 32×
- Shioji v. ShiojiUtah Supreme Court· 1985-11-27· cited 29×
- Kramer v. KramerUtah Supreme Court· 1987-05-15· cited 27×
- Haddow v. HaddowUtah Supreme Court· 1985-09-30· cited 27×
- Crouse v. CrouseCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-09-11· cited 25×
- Cummings v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-11-27· cited 25×
- Moody v. MoodyUtah Supreme Court· 1985-12-06· cited 25×
- Hardy v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-06-20· cited 24×
- Thronson v. ThronsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-03-25· cited 19×
- Kishpaugh v. KishpaughUtah Supreme Court· 1987-11-06· cited 19×
- Huish v. MunroCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-07-25· cited 18×
- Fontenot v. FontenotUtah Supreme Court· 1986-01-17· cited 15×
- Sigg v. SiggCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1995-10-26· cited 15×
- Stevens v. CollardCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-09-01· cited 13×
- Hirsch v. HirschUtah Supreme Court· 1986-09-05· cited 13×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.