Utah Supreme Court· 8/15/1988

Noble v. Noble

Citations

761 P.2d 1369
89 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
1988 Utah LEXIS 72
1988 WL 86047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing tort claims, which are legal in nature, should remain separate from -dissolution proceedings, which are equitable in nature
recognizing tort claims, which are legal in nature, should remain separate from dissolution proceedings, which are equitable in nature
holding “[t]ort claims, which are legal in nature, should be kept separate from divorce actions, which are equitable in nature.”
reaffirming Lord and noting that “if spouses have tort claims pending against each other which are likely to have a bearing on the outcome of the divorce action, those claims should be resolved prior to the divorce proceedings”
where wife had present and future support needs and husband had inability to provide sufficient alimony, it was equitable to award wife premarital property
“trial court must make adequate findings and conclusions demonstrating that it has considered [relevant] factors” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman, Hall, Howe, Stewart, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Noble v. Noble

35 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.