Utah Supreme Court· 9/30/1986
Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 726 P.2d 423
- 43 Utah Adv. Rep. 5
- 1986 Utah LEXIS 882
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- findings of fact must show that decree “follows logically from, and is supported by, the evidence”
- deeming it \essential\ that a custody determination set forth \the basic facts which show why that ultimate conclusion is justified\
- deeming it \essential\ that a custody determination set forth \the basic facts which show why that ultimate conclusion is justified\
- imposing requirement of detailed findings and reasons for decree awarding custody
- imposing requirement of detailed findings and reasons for decree awarding custody
- imposing requirement of detailed findings and reasons for decree awarding custody
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court· 1988-02-03· cited 250×
- Acton v. DeliranUtah Supreme Court· 1987-05-22· cited 107×
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court· 1995-01-18· cited 87×
- Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 77×
- Gardner v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court· 1988-01-04· cited 70×
- Maughan v. MaughanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-02-22· cited 60×
- Davis v. DavisUtah Supreme Court· 1988-01-21· cited 49×
- Rasband v. RasbandCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-04-18· cited 39×
- Riche v. RicheCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-12-13· cited 34×
- Bakanowski v. BakanowskiCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-10-23· cited 34×
- Marchant v. MarchantCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-09-18· cited 31×
- Tucker v. TuckerUtah Supreme Court· 1996-01-17· cited 27×
- State v. VigilCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-06-21· cited 24×
- Sanderson v. TryonUtah Supreme Court· 1987-06-16· cited 24×
- Hamby v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-01-24· cited 24×
- Sukin v. SukinCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-11-27· cited 20×
- Ebbert v. EbbertCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-11-03· cited 20×
- Kishpaugh v. KishpaughUtah Supreme Court· 1987-11-06· cited 19×
- Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1992-05-28· cited 16×
- Myers v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-02-02· cited 16×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hutchison v. HutchisonUtah Supreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 86×
- Hogge v. HoggeUtah Supreme Court· 1982-06-17· cited 81×
- Rucker v. DaltonUtah Supreme Court· 1979-07-26· cited 67×
- Kallas v. KallasUtah Supreme Court· 1980-06-23· cited 55×
- Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 1986-06-20· cited 40×
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court· 1981-09-04· cited 35×
- Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court· 1985-03-07· cited 33×
- Shioji v. ShiojiUtah Supreme Court· 1985-11-27· cited 29×
- Moody v. MoodyUtah Supreme Court· 1985-12-06· cited 25×
- Cox v. CoxUtah Supreme Court· 1975-03-06· cited 21×
- Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court· 1958-03-14· cited 21×
- Hirsch v. HirschUtah Supreme Court· 1986-09-05· cited 13×
- Shioji v. ShiojiUtah Supreme Court· 1983-09-13· cited 9×
- Elwell v. BD. OF ED. OF PARK CITYUtah Supreme Court· 1981-02-19· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.