Skip to main content

Howell v. Howell

Citations

  • 806 P.2d 1209
  • 155 Utah Adv. Rep. 18
  • 1991 Utah App. LEXIS 26
  • 1991 WL 25025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court “did not err in refusing to adjust property distribution because of . . . theoretical [tax] consequences” of selling a second home
  • holding that the district court “did not err in refusing to adjust property distribution 20190106-CA 47 2022 UT App 5 Wadsworth v. Wadsworth because of . . . theoretical [tax] consequences” of selling a second home
  • holding that the district court “did not err in refusing to adjust property distribution 20190106-CA 47 2022 UT App 5 Wadsworth v. Wadsworth because of . . . theoretical [tax] consequences” of selling a second home
  • holding that the district court “did not err in refusing to adjust property distribution 20190106-CA 47 2022 UT App 5 Wadsworth v. Wadsworth because of . . . theoretical [tax] consequences” of selling a second home
  • holding that it was appropriate \to look to the standard of living existing at or near the time of trial in determining alimony\ where husband's income had doubled between the time of the parties' separation and the time of trial
  • explaining that “[e]xact mathematical equality of income is not required, but sufficient parity to allow both parties to be on equal footing financially as of the time of the divorce is required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bench, Garff, Greenwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.