Ashton v. Ashton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attorney's expert opinion on the effect of a joint tenant's conveyance was inadmissible statement of law
• \A constructive trust is an equitable remedy which arises by operation of law to prevent unjust enrichment.\
• attorney’s expert opinion as to effect of joint tenant’s conveyance was inadmissible statement of law
• “An appellant must marshal all of the evidence in support of the trial court’s findings. Only then can we consider whether those findings are ‘clearly erroneous.”'
• challenge to trial court’s findings failed because appellant did not marshal evidence
• “Hypothetical questions must be based upon facts in evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).