Skip to main content

Davidson v. State

Citations

  • 558 N.E.2d 1077
  • 1990 Ind. LEXIS 165
  • 1990 WL 126126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a polygraph examiner’s testimony at a suppression hearing regarding his training, experience, and the conditions of the examination was sufficient to Jind the polygraph results admissible at trial
  • observing that the Court in Pavone v. State, 273 Ind. 162, 402 N.E.2d 976 (1980), approved the prerequisites outlined in Owens
  • holding the polygraph examiner testified as to his training and experience and the conditions under which the appellant’s examination was conducted and the trial court thus had sufficient testimonial foundation before it to rule the polygraph results admissible
  • following a \speaking authority\ analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Givan, Shepard, Debruler, Pivarnik, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.