Skip to main content

State v. McCormick

Citations

  • 397 N.E.2d 276
  • 272 Ind. 272
  • 1979 Ind. LEXIS 794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • introducing, at the capital sentencing phase, evidence of an unrelated murder, for which defendant was neither tried nor convicted, violates due process
  • introducing, at the capital sentencing phase, evidence of an unrelated murder, for which defendant was neither tried nor convicted, violates due process
  • expressing the concern that a jury which had already convicted defendant of murder would be tainted in passing on the likelihood of his having committed other like offenses
  • expressing the concern that a jury which had already convicted defendant of murder would be tainted in passing on the likelihood of his having committed other like offenses
  • expressing concern about already tainted jury deciding defendant’s guilt about prior unad-judicated offenses
  • statutory aggravating circumstance violates Due Process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Hunter, Prentice, Debruler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.