Rhinehardt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant waived constitutional vagueness challenge by failing to raise it prior to trial by timely and proper motion to dismiss
• holding that defendant failed to preserve claim that statute was unconstitutionally vague where he failed to raise the issue prior to trial by a timely and proper motion to dismiss
• holding that defendant did not preserve claim that a statute was unconstitutionally vague where he did not raise the issue prior to trial by a timely and proper motion to dismiss
• intent to kill may be inferred from use of a deadly weapon in a manner reasonably likely to cause death
• “Even assuming appellant had preserved this claim, it would not constitute reversible error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).