Skip to main content

Miller v. State

Citations

  • 716 N.E.2d 367
  • 1999 Ind. LEXIS 785
  • 1999 WL 735807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to preserve an error in a ruling on a motion in limine for appellate review, a party must do more than challenge the ruling itself; the party must offer the evidence at trial to give the trial court an opportunity to rule on its admissibility at that time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.