David Russell v. Edward Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a witness undermines his credibility when he makes a claim “in the face of contradictory evidence”
• explaining that a court’s “comment[] on causation only three times” did not plainly destroy the overall fairness of the trial
• applying the plain-error standard to unpreserved issues in civil cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).