Nebraska Supreme Court· 5/9/2008
Aon Consulting v. Midlands Financial
Citations
- 748 N.W.2d 626
- 275 Neb. 642
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in breach of contract case, ultimate objective of damages award is to put injured party in same position injured party would have occupied if contract had been performed, that is, to make injured party whole
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heavican
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. OldsonNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-06-10· cited 378×
- Recio v. EversNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-08-28· cited 106×
- Koricic v. BEVERLY ENTERPRISES-NEBRASKANebraska Supreme Court· 2009-10-16· cited 102×
- The Lamar Co., LLC v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-09-04· cited 81×
- Dutton-Lainson Co. v. Continental Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2010-02-05· cited 64×
- Conley v. BrazerNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-09-04· cited 36×
- Acordia of Ohio, L.L.C. v. FishelOhio Supreme Court· 2012-10-11· cited 18×
- West Plains, LLC v. Retzlaff Grain Company Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2017-08-30· cited 18×
- OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED v. County Qwick Print, Inc.D. Maine· 2010-05-04· cited 16×
- Thon v. Saginaw Paint Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-11-02· cited 15×
- David Russell v. Edward AndersonEighth Circuit· 2020-07-15· cited 15×
- Dietzel Enters. v. J. A. Wever Constr.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2022-09-16· cited 11×
- HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, Ltd. v. BymoenNevada Supreme Court· 2009-06-11· cited 9×
- Dick v. Koski Prof. GroupNebraska Supreme Court· 2020-10-30· cited 9×
- Cabela's LLC v. HighbyD. Delaware· 2019-01-24· cited 9×
- Acordia of Ohio, L.L.C. v. FishelOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-24· cited 8×
- Gaver v. Schneider's O.K. Tire Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2014-11-14· cited 7×
- Sinsel v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-12-24· cited 5×
- Slater v. IchtertzNebraska Supreme Court· 2025-10-24· cited 4×
- OMNI Behavioral Health v. Nebraska Foster Care Review Bd.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-04-23· cited 3×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Schafersman v. Agland Coop.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2001-07-20· cited 492×
- Bellino v. McGrath North Mullin & Kratz, PC LLONebraska Supreme Court· 2007-08-17· cited 180×
- Equifax Services, Inc., D/B/A Equifax Commercial Specialists F/k/a White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc. v. Steven A. HitzTenth Circuit· 1990-06-04· cited 164×
- Reeves v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-08-12· cited 154×
- Trieweiler Ex Rel. Varsity Investments, Inc. v. SearsNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-12-17· cited 146×
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-07-26· cited 145×
- Nebraska Nutrients, Inc. v. ShepherdNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-05-11· cited 135×
- In Re Trust of RosenbergNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-02-09· cited 106×
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-12-14· cited 100×
- Poppe v. SiefkerNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-07-27· cited 90×
- Boisen v. Petersen Flying Service, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1986-03-14· cited 88×
- City of Lincoln v. Realty Trust Group, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2005-11-04· cited 87×
- Home Pride Foods, Inc. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-10-19· cited 84×
- Anderson v. BellinoNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-03-28· cited 74×
- MacKe v. PierceNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-05-23· cited 67×
- GAB Business Services, Inc. v. Lindsey & Newsom Claim Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2000-09-26· cited 57×
- Rader v. ThrasherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-01-25· cited 51×
- Erickson v. U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2007-09-07· cited 47×
- Par 3, Inc. v. LivingstonNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-09-10· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.