Rodriguez v. Riddell Sports, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the court must articulate its basis for admitting expert testimony”
• upholding jury award despite factual error in jury charge because the court of appeals must “assume the jury considered all the evidence in reaching its decision”
• “To trigger a Daubert inquiry, an expert’s testimony, or its ‘factual basis, data, principles, methods, or their application,’ must be ‘called sufficiently into question.’” (quoting Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 149 (1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).