Inacom Corp., a Delaware Corporation v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a New York Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a choice-of-law provision did not apply to a fraudulent-concealment claim that “arose out of the circumstances surrounding the formation of the contract”
• concluding that a choice-of- law provision did not apply to a fraudulent-concealment claim that “arose out of the circumstances surrounding the formation of the contract”
• upholding denial of new trial based on weight of evidence for jury verdict on Nebraska law claim
• applying law of state where plaintiff received, took action on, and suffered damages from fraudulent concealment
• contrasting a broad clause, which applies to all rights and duties relating to an agreement, with a narrow clause, which provides that an agreement itself is governed by a certain state’s law
• contrasting a broad clause, which applies to all rights and duties relating to an agreement, with a narrow clause, which provides that an agreement itself is governed by a certain state's law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).