Wingate v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an issue was waived where the defendant summarized the rules but did not make a cogent argument regarding the application of the rules
• holding trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance by not arguing the State violated Criminal Rule 4(B) when it filed additional charges
• explaining that a party waives an issue where the party fails to develop a cogent argument or provide adequate citation to authority and portions of the record
• noting that a party waives an issue where the party fails to develop a cogent argument or provide adequate citation to authority and portions of the record.
• “A party waives an issue where the party fails to develop a cogent argument or provide adequate citation to authority and portions of the record.”
• “A party waives an issue where the party fails to develop a cogent argument or provide adequate citation to authority and portions of the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).