Skip to main content

K.S. v. State

Citations

  • 849 N.E.2d 538
  • 2006 Ind. LEXIS 516
  • 2006 WL 1719939

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that judgments entered by a court having subject matter and personal jurisdiction are not void
  • holding that judgments entered by a court having subject matter and personal jurisdiction are not void
  • holding that untimely claim of procedural error was waived
  • explaining that “[s]ubject matter jurisdiction is the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which any particular proceeding belongs” and personal jurisdiction requires that the parties be appropriately served
  • explaining that claims of procedural error do not implicate subject matter jurisdiction questions
  • observing that a claim of procedural error was untimely where the appellant “did not object during the[] proceedings” and the appellant’s later collateral attack, though “characterized as jurisdictional,” was ultimately not jurisdictional in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

241 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named K.S. v. State

29 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.